No refund of court fees when matter is settled by Mediation – Supreme court
Top Stories
No refund of court fees when matter is settled by Mediation – Supreme court
No refund of court fees when matter is settled by Mediation. Refund permissible only if settlement is before Lok Adalat.
Copy of judgement attached.
Burden of establishing that an employer is an ‘industry’ is on the employee – Delhi HC
Burden of establishing that an employer is an ‘industry’ is on the employee
Copy of judgement attached
Employers are liable to pay interest at 10% if they delay payment of gratuity – Jharkhand HC
Employers are liable to pay interest at 10% rate if they delay in payment of gratuity.
Copy of judgement attached.
The law does not provide for payment of gratuity in installments – Kerala High Court
The law does not provide for payment of gratuity in installments as the purpose of gratuity is to serve as a retirement or terminal benefit ensuring immediate financial support to the employee or their dependents, as the case may be. It provides financial protection during the autumn years of a retired employee’s life.
Copy of judgement attached
Labour Court in exercise of power under Section 33- C(2) cannot determine entitlement of retrenchment compensation – Punjab & Haryana HC
Labour Court in exercise of power under Section 33- C(2) cannot determine entitlement of retrenchment compensation.
Copy of judgement attached.
Dispute related to wages and termination of an employee are non-arbitrable – Supreme Court
Dispute related to wages and termination of an employee were non-arbitrable and would be exclusively dealt with by the statutory authorities established under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (“PW Act”) and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (“ID Act”).
Copy of judgement attached.
State Government cannot regulate employment of persons in private industrial establishments – Calcutta HC
State Government cannot regulate employment of persons in private industrial establishments.
Copy of judgement attached
Maharashtra notifies holidays under Negotiable Instruments Act for 2025
Maharashtra notifies holidays under Negotiable Instruments Act for 2025.
Copy of notification attached
Placement in the select list gives no indefeasible right to appointment – Supreme Court
Placement in the select list gives no indefeasible right to appointment. The State or its instrumentality for bona fide reasons may choose not to fill up the vacancies. However, if vacancies exist, the State or its instrumentality cannot arbitrarily deny appointment to a person within the zone of consideration in the select list.
Copy of judgement attached
Decisions which at time can be harsh causing hardship to an employee cannot be termed as acts which would amount to abetment to suicide – Delhi HC
Certain decisions which at time can be harsh causing hardship to an employee. The same cannot, in the absence of the requisite mens rea, be termed as an action which would amount to incitement/abetment in terms of Section 306 of the IPC
Copy of judgement attached.
It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when lookin