Criminal conviction not necessary for forfeiture of gratuity if misconduct involves offence of moral turpitude – Supreme Court
We value your privacy
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By clicking "Accept All", you consent to our use of cookies.
We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
No cookies to display.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
No cookies to display.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
No cookies to display.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
No cookies to display.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
No cookies to display.
Top Stories
Criminal conviction not necessary for forfeiture of gratuity if misconduct involves offence of moral turpitude – Supreme Court
Copy of judgement attached.
If the disciplinary authority accepts the findings recorded by the enquiry officer, no detailed reasons are required to be recorded in the order imposing punishment. – Supreme Court
If the disciplinary authority accepts the findings recorded by the enquiry officer and passes an order, no detailed reasons are required to be recorded in the order imposing punishment.
Copy of judgement attached.
Uma Devi’s judgment does not justify the perpetual exploitation of daily wage workers denying them the benefits of regularization – Supreme court
Uma Devi’s judgment does not justify the perpetual exploitation of daily wage workers denying them the benefits of regularization.
Copy of judgement attached
Ban On Fresh Recruitment No Excuse To Deny Benefits Of Regularization To Daily Wage Workers – Supreme Court
Ban On Fresh Recruitment No Excuse To Deny Benefits Of Regularization To Daily Wage Workers
Copy of judgement attached
One-sided, forfeiture clauses in builder-buyer agreements are “unfair trade practices” – Supreme court
One-sided, forfeiture clauses in builder-buyer agreements are “unfair trade practices.
Copy of judgement attached
Advocate cannot represent a workman in an enquiry where the Management Representative is not a legally trained person – Bombay HC
Advocate cannot represent a workman in an enquiry where the Management Representative is not a legally trained person.
Copy of judgement attached
Writ Petition not maintainable against NBFC, Private Bank – Supreme Court
An entity being subject to regulatory guidelines under a statute does not automatically make it subject to Writ Jurisdiction.
Copy of judgement attached.
Supreme Court directs Government to consider the enactment of a law to protect the rights of domestic workers
The SC have the following directions:-
“As regard to the larger issue of the protection of rights of domestic workers,we direct the Ministry of Labour and Employment in tandem with the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, the Ministry of Women and Child Development, and the Ministry of Law and Justice, to jointly constitute a Committee comprising subject experts to consider the desirability of recommending a legal framework for the benefit, protection and regulation of the rights of domestic workers.”
Copy of judgement attached.
Allegation of forced resignation is a civil dispute and not criminal intimidation.
Allegation of forced resignation is a civil dispute and not criminal intimidation.
Judgement Attached
Acquittal in a criminal case does not exonerate the person in disciplinary proceedings – Supreme Court
Acquittal in a criminal case does not exonerate the person in disciplinary proceedings.
Copy of judgement attached
It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when lookin