Recording of evidence in a disciplinary proceeding proposing charges of a major punishment is mandatory -; Supreme Court
Top Stories
Recording of evidence in a disciplinary proceeding proposing charges of a major punishment is mandatory -; Supreme Court
Recording of evidence in a disciplinary proceeding proposing charges of a major punishment is mandatory.
Copy of judgement attached
Factual finding of the Labour Court should not normally be disturbed by a Writ Court without compelling reason – Supreme court
Factual finding of the Labour Court should not normally be disturbed by a Writ Court without compelling reason.
Copy of judgement attached
Absence of 90 days and not responding to noticed would amount to abandonment of employment- Supreme Court
Absence of 90 days and not responding to noticed would amount to abandonment of employment.
Copy of judgement attached
Retention allowances paid to seasonal workers is to be included for PF contributions under the EPF Act, 1952 – Bombay HC
Retention allowances paid to seasonal workers must be included in basic wages for PF contributions under the EPF Act, 1952.
Copy of judgement attached
Appellate authority under POSH Act has implied power to consider passing of interim order of stay as well -Karnataka HC
Appellate authority under POSH Act has implied power to consider passing of interim order of stay as well –
Copy of judgement attached.
Compassionate appointment is not a vested right
Compassionate appointment is not a vested right.
Copy of judgement attached
Article 14 of the Constitution cannot be used to perpetuate illegality – Supreme Court
Article 14 of the Constitution cannot be used to perpetuate illegality
Copy of judgement attached
Recruitment Rules cannot be changed midway after the selection process for posts has begun unless the relevant rules expressly permit so – Supreme Court
Recruitment Rules cannot be changed midway after the selection process for posts has begun unless the relevant rules expressly permit so.
Copy of judgement attached
Placement in the select list gives no indefeasible right to appointment – Supreme Court
Placement in the select list gives no indefeasible right to appointment. The State or its instrumentality for bona fide reasons may choose not to fill up the vacancies. However, if vacancies exist, the State or its instrumentality cannot arbitrarily deny appointment to a person within the zone of consideration in the select list.
Copy of judgement attached
Decisions which at time can be harsh causing hardship to an employee cannot be termed as acts which would amount to abetment to suicide – Delhi HC
Certain decisions which at time can be harsh causing hardship to an employee. The same cannot, in the absence of the requisite mens rea, be termed as an action which would amount to incitement/abetment in terms of Section 306 of the IPC
Copy of judgement attached.