Acquittal in a criminal trial has no bearing or relevance on the disciplinary proceedings as the standard of proof in both the cases are different.
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v Dilip Uttam Jayabhay
Copy of the judgement is attached
Top Stories
Acquittal in a criminal trial has no bearing or relevance on the disciplinary proceedings as the standard of proof in both the cases are different.
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v Dilip Uttam Jayabhay
Copy of the judgement is attached
The Hon’ble Delhi High Cour held as follows
“The Act is a beneficial legislation for the purpose of safeguarding the rights of pregnant women. The provisions of the Act have to be given effect to, in letter and spirit. Technical issues would not come in the way of the Court or the authority concerned, in recognizing the said benefits. An organisation is expected to be empathetic to the cause of a pregnant woman rather than making bald allegations”
Copy of the judgement
The Supreme Court of India has held that In matters relating to service jurisprudence, time and again it has been held that it is not essential to implead each and every one who could be affected but if a section of such affected employees is impleaded then the interest of all is represented and protected. In view of the above, it is well settled that impleadment of a few of the affected employees would be sufficient compliance of the principle of joinder of parties and they could defend the interest of all affected persons in their representative capacity. Non-joining of all the parties cannot be held to be fatal.
Copy of the judgment is attached
It is a long established fact that a reader will be distracted by the readable content of a page when lookin
